|
|
|
An Uncivil War
General George G. Meade & The
Pennsylvania Reserves In Northern Virginia
October 9 to December 6, 1861
By Peter Holman
The Cleveland Civil War Roundtable
Copyright © 2004, All Rights Reserved |
|
A Map
of Fairfax County, and parts of Loudoun and Prince William Counties,
Va., and the District of Columbia.
Civil War Maps. Copied by J. Paul Hoffmann, Top'l Office, A.N.Va.
Approved S. Howell Brown. 1st Lt. Engs. Troops in chg. Top'l. Dep't.
A.N.Va. March 23rd 1864. American Memory. Lib. of Congress. 1 July
2004 |
When
the news of the surrender of Fort Sumter on April 14, 1861 was telegraphed to
Michigan, Captain George Gordon Meade of the U.S. Topographical Bureau
anticipated early relief from the remote duty of surveying northern lakes and
a return to the true business of the soldier - warfare.
Since graduating from West Point in July,
1835, Meade's considerable skills as an engineer had provided him with steady
employment. On the other hand, promotion in times of peace was slow; it had
taken 21 years to move from Lieutenant to Captain. Meade's work in Detroit was
important and not unpleasant but honor demanded that his talents should be
employed at the place where his country was threatened. He was keenly aware
that Lincoln's call for a massive volunteer force would require the wholesale
promotion of regular army officers to lead the new regiments. Honor and
ambition could both be served.
Meade's experience in the Mexican war in 1846
had done little to prepare him for a civil war. He had heard of irregular
warfare conducted by Mexican "militia" composed of farm laborers but
his had not been a combat assignment. Perhaps the closest he came to danger
was in Matamoras when undisciplined U.S. volunteer forces on one side of the
river would take potshots at the regular U.S. army camp on the other side. But
in this coming civil war sectional feeling would split not only the country
but also families and friendships. Distinctions between soldier and civilian,
loyal and disloyal would increasingly be blurred.
Powerful people were swift to question
Meade's own patriotism in April, 1861, only a week after the fall of Sumter,
when he calmly declined to cooperate with a locally organized "loyalty
oath" in Detroit. Meade believed that it would set a bad precedent to
require his tiny command to subscribe to such oaths. Instead, he and his
officers signed a paper expressing their willingness to take an oath of
allegiance whenever the War Department called upon them to do so. The War
Department did not.1
Perhaps the resulting hostility of Michigan
senator Zachariah Chandler caused Meade's strenuous pleas for reassignment to
be disregarded while topographers of less seniority, such as John Pope and
William B. Franklin, won promotion easily.2 While Meade pressed his case
without success, the humiliation of Union forces at Bull Run on July 21, 1861
brought Major-General George B. McClellan east to run the newly created
Division of the Potomac, soon to be more famously renamed the Army of the
Potomac.
Among McClellan's many concerns was the lack
of adequate fortifications on the Maryland side of the Potomac, especially
around Tenallytown. He also found that "there was nothing to prevent the
enemy shelling the city from heights within easy range, which could be
occupied by a hostile column almost without resistance. Many soldiers had
deserted, and the streets of Washington were crowded with straggling officers
and men, absent from their stations without authority, whose behavior
indicated the general want of discipline and organization."3
In this latter sentiment he echoed Meade's
own opinion that the debacle at Bull Run was evidence that the army was
neither efficiently officered nor organized, lacks that he proposed to
correct. McClellan appointed Colonel Andrew Porter as provost-marshal to clear
the stragglers from the streets of Washington and began to reorganize the army
and put in place new leadership, untainted by failure. In early September,
Captain Meade was delighted to receive, at last, a commission as Brigadier
General of volunteers from the State of Pennsylvania effective August 31,
1861.
Thirteen regiments of Pennsylvania volunteers
were gathering at Tenallytown, Md. (present-day Tenley, a suburb of
Georgetown) under the command of General George A McCall. His would be a
unique division, the only one in the Union army composed entirely of regiments
raised in a single state. Styled the "Pennsylvania Reserves", these
troops went through several organizational phases during August and early
September, 1861 as McClellan conducted reviews, often accompanied by President
Lincoln. No doubt McClellan was pleased that McCall's Reserves had
"constructed a square redoubt at Tenallytown, mounting twelve guns, which
was named Fort Pennsylvania" and had "built two lunettes and named
them Fort Gaines and Fort Cameron. These works formed part of the
fortifications for the defense of Washington."4
On September 16, 1861 the Reserves were
finally organized into three brigades of infantry, supported by one regiment
of cavalry and Easton's artillery battery. Forty-five-year old George Gordon Meade
took command of the 2nd Brigade, the largest of the three, consisting of the
3rd, 4th, 7th and 11th volunteer infantry regiments. Meade's days at
Tenallytown were spent on paperwork and only secondarily on learning to handle
his rowdy volunteers and to impose, as far as possible, the disciplined
responses of the regular army. As he and his new command sized each other up
in Maryland, the war sputtered fitfully in the northern Virginia counties
bordering the Potomac.
The next Federal command west of Tenallytown
was Stone's brigade of Bank's division. The 34th New York was at Seneca Mills,
Md., guarding the banks of the river and occasionally sending pickets across
the water at nearby Bowser's Ford to stand watch on Lowe's Island (sometimes
Lowe's Flats) in Fairfax County, Va.5
In August of 1861, such an outpost was
attacked by Confederate irregulars. Two soldiers of the 34th NY were shot dead
"stripped and left … so that the hogs ate them"6 and one, Private
Robert Gracey Jr. of Co. H, was wounded, captured and taken deeper into
Fairfax County.
Four miles to the south of Lowe's Island, the
Gunnell family and their Coleman cousins considered the looming threat of the
Union army to their substantial holdings in both land and slaves. Charles
Coleman brooded in his tavern in Dranesville while 40-year old John Ratcliffe
Gunnell, like Meade a veteran of the Mexican war, decided to join the Southern
army. John, soon to be described by General McCall as "a squire and noted
secessionist,"7
left his slaves and his prosperous plantation near
present-day Great Falls in care of his brother James and sister-in-law
Catherine and on September 14, 1861 he enlisted as a private in Company G,
8th Infantry Regiment of Virginia volunteers.8
George Meade and John Gunnell
would never meet but after the rebel left home to find a war, the Union
general brought the war to his home.
Ready or not but eager for action, on October
9, 1861 the Pennsylvania Reserve division crossed the Potomac on the Chain
Bridge and entered Virginia, setting up camp near Langley, in the area of the
current-day intersection of the Georgetown Pike and Balls Hill Road. Here in
enemy territory the different nature of a civil war was immediately evident
for Virginia had not one but two governors.
|
|
|
John Letcher was the legally elected pre-war
governor and remained firmly established in Richmond after taking his state
out of the Union and into the Confederacy. Francis H. Peirpoint in western
Virginia was recognized by the Lincoln administration as the loyal and hence
'true' state authority based in Wheeling. The Pennsylvania Reserves named
their new location Camp Peirpoint after the loyal administrator though some
could not agree on the spelling, perhaps including the "Governor"
himself!9
Hardly had the Reserves settled into Camp
Peirpoint than the longed-for opportunity for action came. As Meade explained
in a letter to his wife, Margaret, on October 18, 1861 "the enemy, it is
understood, have fallen back to their old lines at Bull Run. They have had a
force above us at Leesburg…. the object of our expedition is to reconnoiter
the country, and also with the hope of cutting off some of their troops coming
down from Leesburg. We go with the whole division, some twelve thousand
strong, with three batteries of artillery, and if we encounter any of their
troops, will have a very pretty chance for a nice little fight of our
own."10
Major General George B. McClellan, commander
of the Army, believed the rebels would move faster if pushed a little. After
all, in their place, he certainly would retreat at any hint of overwhelming
enemy strength. Accordingly, he ordered McCall to take his division 11 miles
to the west to the important intersection of the Leesburg and Georgetown pikes
at Dranesville. Simultaneous demonstrations further north on the Potomac at
Ball's Bluff and Edward's Ferry might confound and confuse the rebels into a
calamitous stampede.
With the 2nd and 3rd brigades under Meade and
Ord moving up in support as far as Difficult Run, Reynolds took the 1st
Brigade on to Dranesville itself on October 19th where they bivouacked.
October 20th was spent in divisional reconnaissance probes into the
surrounding countryside. Finding no rebels to push and having fulfilled his
orders from McClellan, McCall ordered the division to return to camp at 10
a.m. on the 21st.11
Even as they marched back to Langley, a few
miles further upstream atop the steep Potomac banks near Leesburg, Union
forces under General C. P. Stone met with disaster at Ball's Bluff. With
little fondness for retreat, "Shanks" Evans, the rebel hero of Bull
Run, had correctly decided that McCall was no threat. He was assisted in this
by the capture of a courier bearing orders from McCall to Meade that revealed
the limited nature of the Reserves' advance. With ever decreasing concern for
his right flank and rear, Evans was able to move up his own overwhelming
forces to trap Stone's men against the river and shoot them down in droves.12
Meade thought the worst part of the business
was that the advance of McCall's Division was only ten miles off and "had
we been ordered forward, instead of back, we could have captured the whole of
(the confederate force)". He assumed that McClellan would have so ordered
had he known of the true circumstances at Ball's Bluff.13
In what could be a reaction to criticism of
his own leadership, McClellan wrote McCall a "severe letter"
complaining that the Reserves exhibited poor discipline, worse than any other
division. Meade conceded that discipline was much below what it should be but
he felt that McClellan was being ill-advised. It would take the Lincoln
administration a little longer to conclude with Meade that "Little
Mac" exhibited a "want of moral courage without which no man can be
a great commander."14
Replacing Winfield Scott as General in Chief
of all the Armies on November 1st and under relentless pressure to act,
McClellan contented himself with reconnoitering and foraging while he
perfected his plans. Perhaps he could satisfy the politicians by doing
something about the bushwhackers and other disloyal types that infested
northern Virginia but who were these traitors? What was needed was a specific
denouncement - and one duly arrived.
On November 26, 1861, according to John
Hawkshurst, a member of the Union Legislature of Virginia, "three Negroes
belonging to a Mrs. Coleman" came into Camp Griffin, Va. and named the killers
of the Union pickets on Lowe's Island back in August.15
All the accused were
residents of Fairfax county, including Richard Gunnell of Great Falls and the
brothers John (also known as Richard) and Thomas Coleman of Dranesville.
|
|
|
McClellan penned instructions that all the
killers must be caught immediately, held for trial and all evidence against
them sent to him.16
He looked to the closest available Union force south of the
Potomac, which was McCall's division of Pennsylvania Reserves. That worthy
promptly ordered Col. George Bayard to take his 1st Pennsylvania Cavalry back
to Dranesville to apprehend the accused men, anticipating little opposition.
There had been none a month earlier although sporadic picket clashes were
common.
The horsemen left Camp Peirpoint at 9 p.m. on
Tuesday November 26, 1861 and reached Dranesville at 5 a.m. on the 27th after
a "very tedious and toilsome march" of eight hours covering some
eleven miles in the cold, damp and darkness. Sending two companies from the
north and eight from the east and south, Bayard's men captured two of Jeb
Stuart's pickets, Privates Whitten and Hildebrand of the 30th Virginia
cavalry, without firing a shot. They then roused out of bed and arrested six
citizens whom Bayard called "secessionists of the bitterest stamp".
These were Charles. W. Coleman, John. B. Farr, John T. DeBell, Dr. John Day,
Dr. William Day, and Richard H. Gunnell, the last 3 having been specifically
identified as murderers by Coleman's slaves. Thomas and John Coleman were
not to be found although Thomas' whereabouts would soon be painfully learned.17
Having accomplished his mission, Bayard turned
his weary forces homeward but as they rode down the Georgetown Pike the head
of his column of about 800 troopers came under fire from four men waiting in
ambush in a pine woods between present day Walker Road in what is now the town
of Great Falls and Difficult Run to the south east. Their leader, Captain
William Downs Farley would achieve fame as "Jeb Stuart's favorite
scout". The intrepid 26 year old was supported by Lt. Frank Decaradeux
and Philip W. Carper both of the 7th North Carolina Volunteers. Carper was
also a former resident of Dranesville and had brought along one of his near
neighbors, the much-sought Thomas Coleman. Farley had planned to attack Bayard
from the shelter of the big pines on their way out to Dranesville. The four
men had lain in wait all the previous afternoon. But Bayard's late start had
fooled the Confederates who gave up at dusk to pass the night in a nearby
house, perhaps that of John Gunnell. Coleman would have been welcomed by his
distant cousins.
Farley brought his band back to the 'pike
early the next morning, barely in time to observe Bayard's approach from the
"wrong" direction, and hastily re-established the ambush in the
shelter of smaller scrub pines by the Follen farm. At a range of 10-15 yards,
Farley rose up and shouted to his men to fire and a thin volley rattled out.
Bayard tried to rally his badly confused men and Farley rewarded his bravery
by shooting his horse dead and shredding Bayard's coat skirt. Farley then shot
and killed another officer and the four men prepared to scatter into the woods
and thickets, taking advantage of the whirling confusion to escape as planned.
According to Farley, the
"frightened" Mrs. Follen cried out that there were only four
attackers and so encouraged were the Pennsylvanians that they rallied,
dismounted and surrounded the woods. While trying to steal a cavalry horse,
Farley shot its holder down but was himself struck unconscious by a blow from
a mounted cavalryman and captured along with Carper and Decaradeux, who was
wounded in the right hand.18
Thomas Coleman was "shot through the
side" (Farley), "shot twice" (Bayard), "shot in the eye
and breast" (Woodward) and would not survive this desperate venture by
many minutes.
Bayard was to report that "Assistant
Surgeon Alexander was seriously wounded and Private Joel Houghtaling was badly
wounded and I had my horse killed…we killed two and captured four, one of
whom is shot twice and is not expected to live. Private Houghtaling is I fear
mortally wounded. Thos. Coleman, citizen, of Dranesville, is dangerously
wounded."19
Dr. Alexander and Joseph (Joel) Houghtaling were the first of
the Pennsylvania Reserves to die from wounds received in action.
In the unmarried Farley's opinion,
non-combatants such as surgeons had no business wearing an officer's uniform
and he felt no remorse for having shot either man - he had done his duty. The
older, married Meade wrote to Margaret that "the poor doctor who was
wounded in the cavalry skirmish the other day has since died. He was only
twenty-six years old, and leaves a young wife, who reached here three hours
after his death. Such afflictions should reconcile us to our lesser
troubles."20
The attack on Bayard's column caused a
sensation, not to mention inflation, among the Reserves at Camp Peirpoint.
Even in Confederate lines, the coincidence of two doctors being arrested while
a third was shot dead created confusions of understanding. On both sides, the
animosities natural to combat assumed uglier tones.
In a letter home, Lewis M. Pratt of the 1st
Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (Reynolds' 1st Brigade) described the action as
it had been relayed to him:
"Last Tuesday evening, the first Cavalry
Regiment went out towards Leesburg where the Rebels have a large force laying
and when they got about 5 miles from here they were fired into by 300
secessonists concealed in the woods and bushes. The fight resulted in 4 rebels
killed...brought 13 other prisoners with them by here and took them on to
Washington...they took Dr. Day out of bed and brought him along. He is one of
the rankest secesh in Virginia....they shot poison balls at our men. If it had
been me that had of taken them prisoners, I would not of brought them to camp.
I would have shot the cowardly dogs."21
In stark contrast, an unidentified
confederate cavalryman of Company C, 2nd Virginia Cavalry (Stuart Horse
Artillery) in camp at Centreville, equally incensed about Dr. Day's fate,
wrote home on December 8, 1861 that:
"Without bragging at all, the Botetourt
Dragoons have the best cooks and live better than any other company in the
regiment...The enemy are no nearer to us now than they were two months ago.
About seven hundred of them came to Dranesville, one of our picket posts, a
few days ago and caught two of the pickets who were drunk and carried off
several of the citizens. Among the citizens was old Dr. Day who had been
confined to his bed some weeks. They took him from his bed and compelled him
to walk. Their surgeon remonstrated... telling them that it would kill him...
he died shortly after reaching Washington. Cruel wretches, they should
be shown no quarter whatever!"22
Such excessive sentiments and the need to
demonstrate that the army was here in Virginia to stay would provide George
Meade with his first independent mission in the field. The Reserves would go
back to Dranesville for the second time with a lot more than a single cavalry
regiment. This time it would be the turn of the 2nd brigade to lead.
On December 5, 1861 McCall gave Meade his
orders for a foraging expedition. The 2nd brigade, supported by Kern's battery
and a cavalry squadron under Major Jones of the 1st Pa. was to march next day
to Gunnell's farm in Great Falls. Once there, Meade was to fill his wagons
with as much forage as could be found on the farm. He was in particular to
arrest not one but two Colemans, George and John, the missing nephews of John
and Richard Gunnell.
Meade looked forward to being "in
front" and to "having a little brush" with the enemy but he had
a problem with the notion of foraging. He was of the opinion that "the
private property of Secessionists must be respected. Let the ultras on both
sides be repudiated and the masses of conservative and moderate men may
compromise and settle the difficulty". He did not explain in this
November 24, 1861 letter to Margaret what the nature of such a
"compromise" might be but such a position was bound to create
difficulty with the radical Republicans in the Congress and administration.
Indeed, even as McCall wrote the orders for
Meade, a few miles further east in Washington, Ohio Republican senator
Benjamin Wade was introducing a resolution to form a three-man committee to
investigate the reverses at Bull Run and Balls Bluff. James Grimes of Iowa
thought the resolution weak - seven men should be charged to investigate the
entire conduct of the war, both the past and the future of it. The Senate
agreed and by a vote of 33 to 3 created the committee that would soon cast a
grim shadow over the decisions of generals in blue, including and perhaps
especially George G. Meade. A key member of that committee would be Meade's
old nemesis, Zachariah Chandler of Michigan.
 |
John
Gunnell house as it stands today,
Fairfax County, Virginia. |
But there was no committee looking over his
shoulder on Friday, December 6th 1861, as Meade set off at 6 a.m. to lead his
brigade against the cattle, crops and civilians left behind when John R.
Gunnell went off to war. Arriving at about noon, Meade's brigade spent two
hours loading wagons and "stripping his place of everything we thought
would be useful to the enemy or that we could use ourselves…. The man was
absent, but his sister, with his farm and house servants, was at home. The
great difficulty was to prevent the wanton and useless destruction of property
which could not be made available for military purposes. The men and officers
got into their heads that the object of this expedition was the punishment of
a rebel…"23
According to family legend, Catherine Swink
Gunnell (whose husband James had also by now forsaken his brother's farm to
join the rebel army) and her six year old son, George West Gunnell, faced down
the invaders. Barring the way to the cellar door, Catherine managed to retain
their last ham. Perhaps Meade had such a pathetic scene in mind when he
contemplated the nature of this most uncivil war.24
Made nervous by McClellan's reprimand over
poor discipline earlier in the month, General McCall rode to the front during
the expedition to check on his subordinate's progress and found Meade's
command "in most perfect order". In his report to McClellan, McCall
emphasized that "It is with pleasure I refer to the very exemplary
conduct of all the troops on this occasion; I can commend, from personal
observation, the good discipline maintained; there was no straggling or
lagging behind during the march out or returning". Meade brought his
discipline and his brigade back to Camp Peirpoint at 6 p.m. without loss and
with the 57 wagonloads stuffed with grain. He had captured "seven horses,
two oxen, one wagon, one fowling piece and two Negroes."25
|
|
|
George D. Bayard
|
 |
William Downs Farley
|
|
|
As ordered, Meade had also captured George
and John (Richard) Coleman along with 3 others found at the farm, the brothers
Thomas, James and Bernard Poole. In McCall's eyes, the Colemans were "bad
men" who had "been in the habit of watching the Potomac…and firing
on our pickets. They are reported to me by my guide to have shot two
stragglers of General Bank's division and left them for the hogs to
devour". The Pooles were arrested because they were "rank
secessionists."26
McCall sent the captives to General Andrew
Porter, Provost Marshal: "Herewith are transmitted to be held in custody
and disposed of as may be directed by the commanding general two prisoners,
viz: George Coleman and John [Richard] Coleman, taken at the house of John
Gunnell, a squire and noted secessionist. Herewith are also sent two colored
men, the property of John Gunnell, named David Johnson and John Jackson, whose
disposition is to remain with the family but who were brought in as being
available as laborers in the support of the enemy."27
Thus were noted secessionists and accused
murderers hunted down in Fairfax County and, thanks to Bayard and Meade, all
had been captured. And yet, what was the result of all this activity in the
last autumn of American innocence 1861?
In subsequent reviews of the charges against
each of those arrested, an authority no less than E. J. Allen (the pseudonym
of McClellan's chief of secret police, Allen Pinkerton28) seemingly crushed all
arguments on behalf of the prisoners by describing the true facts of the case,
saying in one report which may stand for all:
It has been stated by several different
persons from Dranesville and vicinity whose statements are on file in this
office that that same guerrilla party of which John B. Farr is stated to
have made one member did some time in the month of August last proceed from
Dranesville in the night to a place near Sandy Landing, and there laid in
ambush for a number of U.S. soldiers who had crossed over from the Maryland
side of the Potomac whom they fired upon, killing two or more and wounding
one, which last was taken by said party to Dranesville, where a
glorification was held by them and numerous other secessionists of that
place, the company being made jolly with whisky purchased with money taken
from the rifled pockets of the murdered soldiers. That these soldiers after
thus being killed were robbed of arms and other things about their persons,
among the rest a letter from one of their wives, and were also stripped of
their clothing, which was afterward given to Negro slaves owned by the men
who thus savagely performed these sacrilegious acts and by said slaves was
worn, while the dead and plundered bodies were left unburied on the field to
be eaten up, as they were, by the rebels' hogs; meantime the letter being
publicly read and the other things shown as relics of their horrid chivalry….
All of which, general, is most respectfully
submitted by
Your obedient servant, E. J. ALLEN.29
"E. J. Allen" was to build his
reputation by reporting to McClellan what that General wanted most to hear -
hyperbolic estimates that the rebels were stronger, better equipped and in
better shape than his own army. But Pinkerton's report of the evidence against
the August killers refers to written statements of witnesses claiming to have
certain knowledge. Surely in this instance his information must be accurate?
On the other hand, Charles Coleman was
certain of his own innocence. Writing on December 3rd to Porter, he described
his plight in these words:
"I was arrested a short time ago at my
house in Dranesville in bed and for what charge I do not know unless it was
for feeding the Confederate pickets. I keep a house of public entertainment
and was compelled to feed them or be arrested. I also fed some of General
McCall's men when in Dranesville, and came very near being arrested by the
Confederates for that."30
Again on January 1st he writes (this time to
William H. Seward, Secretary of State):
"It is true I fed the Confederate
pickets, and what would have been the consequence had I refused? I keep a
public house. The meals were called for by the pickets who paid for the same
with their own money. You can see I was compelled to do it… Mr. Gracey, of
the New York Thirty-fourth, who was wounded on Lowe's Island near
Dranesville, was left at my house for two weeks and was attended to by me,
who afterward made his escape from Fairfax Court-House and got back to
Washington, can tell you whether he thinks me a Union man or not… I was
abused by the Confederates for feeding some of General McCall's men and for
selling him 100 bushels oats."31
Coleman offered no explanation of how Private
Gracey came to be left with him in Dranesville and by whom.
|
|
|
Andrew Porter
|
 |
Allen J.
Pinkerton
|
|
|
|
On March 17, 1862, Brig. General W. S.
Rosecrans reported various lists of prisoners confined in the Old Capitol
Prison in Washington D.C. Amongst these were the three Pooles, accused now of
"communicating with the rebels" and the two Colemans, George and
John (Richard) who, along with Bayard's captives, especially the two Doctors
Day, were accused of "assassination of U.S. pickets."32
But on March 24, 1862, the Commission
Relating to Political Prisoners, created in February, reported that the
charges against all five of Meade's captives had been reduced to giving aid
and information to insurgents. Commissioners John A Dix and Edwards
Pierrepoint directed the immediate release of all the prisoners upon their
giving "paroles of honor (to) render no aid or comfort to the enemies in
hostility to the Government of the United States". All five, the Colemans
and the Pooles, along with Richard H.Gunnell and John T. DeBell, were released
on March 25th.33
Dr. John Day and Charles Coleman were
released on June 4, 1862 on parole of honor.34
Eventually, only Dr. William Day
remained in prison. When he agreed to take the oath of allegiance and to
provide a bond of $20,000 for good behavior he too was released, according to
Old Capitol Prison records, on July 15, 1862.35
The Days returned to Dranesville
and were still practicing medicine there in 1870.36
It would appear that Pinkerton, the multiple
testimonies, the vengeful McCall, the efficient Bayard and Meade, had accused
and sought out innocent men. Certainly raids such as Meade's helped to create
the very opposition that it was intended to suppress.
And there lies the rub of civil war for
soldiers such as Meade - the uncertainty as to whether a civilian is a
legitimate target, a guerilla, a bushwhacker. Is there a difference in these
categories and if so, on which side does the prudent soldier err? In August of
1862, Henry W. Halleck, McClellan's successor as General in Chief, would seek
the learned opinion of Dr. Francis Lieber (Columbia College political
scientist and eventual compiler of the Confederate War records on behalf of
the U.S. Government) on this very subject.
In relation to the "bushwhacker"
Dr. Lieber concluded airily that "the importance of writing on this
subject is much diminished by the fact that the soldier generally decides
these cases for himself. The most disciplined soldiers will execute on the
spot an armed and murderous prowler found where he could have no business as a
peaceful citizen."37
In 1861, soldiers commanded by Bayard and
Meade did not take the law into their own hands, perhaps because those accused
of murder were arrested in their homes and were neither armed nor prowling
where they had no business. Nevertheless, it may be significant that Thomas
Coleman, the only civilian among Bayard's four attackers, was shot dead while
three in Confederate uniform were not. Accused of the theft of a pistol from a
dead picket on Lowe's Island, Coleman died before he could be interrogated as
to his possible participation in those August activities. His companions and
family members, all similarly accused, were released on a mere promise of good
behavior, a promise that at least one of them would not keep.
Of Meade and Bayard's captives, Rosecrans
would write straightforwardly and rather overstating the case that "these
(men) are held without the least record of evidence of active crime."38
Meade revealed his own feelings about his first independent action in a letter
to his wife, writing that "It made me sad to do such injury and I really
was ashamed of our cause, which thus required war to be made on
individuals."39
It was not the kind of civil war leadership and action that
he craved.
Over the next three bitter years the forced
removal of civilians ceased to be a question of evidence; the destruction of
private property and merciless foraging could no longer shame the
"cause" of armies that learned their business under fire. Commanders
of such sensibilities as Rosecrans and Meade would be overshadowed by others
who ruthlessly applied new rules of warfare - Grant, Sherman, Sheridan.
But in the first week of December 1861 such
things lay in an unimaginable future. The Pennsylvania Reserves, telling their
tall tales around the campfires of Camp Peirpoint in the winter of Virginia,
had no doubts that their brigadiers, Reynolds, Meade and Ord would achieve
greatness, unaware of what was to come in the summer heat of their own
Pennsylvania hills a mere 18 months later. |
|
 |
William S.
Rosecrans
|
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Columbia Encyclopedia,
Sixth Edition spells
it “Pierpont, Francis Harrison,
1814–99”
(Meade’s usage) but goes on to say that “he himself seems to
have spelled his name Pierpoint”! Official
proclamations, reports and letters from the Wheeling administration
spelled it “Peirpoint”, the usage followed here
-
-
-
O.R. 1, V5, 348-352; Report
on the Battle of Ball’s Bluff; Brig. Genl. Evans to Lt. Col. Thomas
Jordan
-
-
-
-
-
O.R. s1, V, 448-449. Bayard to McCall
-
-
-
-
- Ibid
- Meade, I, 234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
|
|
The Cleveland Civil
War Roundtable
|
|
|
|
|